It should concentrate on one of the following:
Evidence and perspectives. Workshops should examine new revelations about corruption and the fight against it, bring forward successes and reflect on the failures of past interventions, or provide an in-depth examination of how corruption manifests itself and how it impacts our societies. (This may include a discussion of cases, new research into patterns of corruption or progress assessments.)
Solutions and responses. Workshops should bring forward solutions – traditional or innovative – as well as foster consensus around reform proposals, find new allies among IACC participants or demonstrate the way forward to achieve change.
Future trends. Workshops should envision the future of corruption and anti-corruption efforts or offer insight into how current opportunities and threats may shape our fight in the years to come and ultimately contribute to the design of new strategies.
Good submissions should demonstrate how the workshop will:
- Provide clear follow-up actions.
- Incorporate a diversity of gender, sector, race, geographic and other perspectives among panellists or contributors, including people with direct community-level experiences of corruption.
Workshop proposals are more likely to be successful if they consider one of the following cross-cutting questions:
- What is the call for action?
- How do we scale up investment in solutions?
- What insights can new or younger voices offer?
- How do we involve business in the solutions?